RFC: linker enhancements
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Wed Mar 17 18:26:00 GMT 2004
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 10:41:49PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 07:31:16AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > One side-effect of this patch is that when --only-if-needed is in
> > > effect, weak definitions in normal files won't be overridden by
> > > a strong definition in a shared library. I'm not sure whether that's
> > > a bug or a feature..
> >
> > Only if the library is not included, or when it is actually needed as well?
>
> Potentially both cases. elf_link_add_object_symbols won't use a strong
> definition in the lib in preference to a weak definition in a regular
> file until some other definition is needed from the library. At that
> point, further weak definitions in regular objects will be overridden.
Do you have a testcase for that? I think the current linker will never
let any definition from a shared libray override a weak definition in
a regular file.
H.J.
More information about the Binutils
mailing list