Makefile mess in gas

Frédéric L. W. Meunier 1@pervalidus.net
Sun Mar 7 18:56:00 GMT 2004


On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 08:53:00AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > Makefile is a mess in gas. There are 2 problems:
> >
> > 1. Makefile.am and doc/Makefile.am were changed. But Makefile.in and
> > doc/Makefile.in were never updated. Only the part of
> >
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-12/msg00364.html
> >
> > was applied. None of the generated files were checked in.
> >
> > 2. "make install" doesn't install as.1.
> >
> > It is not hard to fix #1. But #2 seems to be done on purpose, according
> > to
> >
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-12/msg00364.html
> >
> > Could someone please take a look at them?
>
> The way I read Maciej's email, his patch was supposed to fix it - the
> way we were previously installing info pages was supressing installing
> man pages.  Do you still see the problem with regenerated
> Makefile.in's?

There's still a "problem" though. One that's been there for
years.

make install installs configure.info and standards.info. While
I don't have any configure.info from other packages, and I
don't know if it ever was in one or should be installed,
standards.info is from Autoconf.

Well, this is from H. J. Lu's release. I'm assuming the GNU
does the same.

-- 
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html



More information about the Binutils mailing list