i386 intel syntax integer load/store fp instructions

[Alan Modra]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 02:14:01PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Is there anybody able to provide the origin for fildd, fistpd, and
> fisttpd? It would seem to me that if thus suffixed instructions exist at
> all in Intel syntax (after all, Intel syntax in general is not known to
> use suffixes), then these would perhaps rather mean 32-bit loads/stores
> (currently, gas translates them to 64-bit ones, identical to the
> respective q-suffixed ones).

I forget why I made the change to i386.h as part of this patch
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2000-q1/msg00155.html

The binutils email archive doesn't seem to contain anything related to
my patch.  The instructions probably should have been removed, as they
duplicate fildq.

Hmm, I see that "fild qword ptr [%esi]" doesn't do the right thing too.
:-(

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre