top-level removal of dejagnu, expect

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jun 10, 2004, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> wrote:

> If a group need such local changes then it is personally reasonable to
> expect that group to maintain them locally.

Long before I worked for Red Hat, having dejagnu as part of the
unified tree saved me from the trouble of having to install a recent
enough version of dejagnu and expect on the 12 different platforms on
which I tested GCC and binutils weekly.  It was very useful for me
long before I joined Red Hat.  I can't believe it's only useful for
Red Hat nowadays.  I'd like the ability to build expect and dejagnu as
part of a unified tree to stay.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}