top-level removal of dejagnu, expect

[Ben Elliston]

> > I'm not sure why you think moving to one copy of the FSF dejagnu
> > sources will disturb that.
> 
> I was concerned about the toplevel build support, not the dejagnu
> sources.  The toplevel makefile/configure can deal with dejagnu being
> there or not, I see no need to remove such support.

The obvious reason to remove such support is to reduce the amount of
stuff to maintain.  If having top-level build support for expect and
dejagnu is important to Red Hat, can't Red Hat maintain local patches?

Ben

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20040610/7862dbbb/attachment.sig>