[PATCH] x86-64 opcode corrections

[Andreas Jaeger]

"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> writes:

> A lot of illegal instructions were accepted by the assembler, and in a
> few cases useless rex prefixes would have been generated.
>
> 2004-06-03 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
>
> 	* include/opcode/i386.h: Adjust instructions descriptions to
> better
> 	match the specification.
> 	* gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-x86_64.d: Adjust expectation for
> leave to
> 	not have a rex prefix.
> 	* gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-inval.[ls]: Add a bunch of
> instructions
> 	illegal in 64-bit mode.

Those instructions are indeed illegal, I've checked them all.

Your mailer wraps around the lines - that makes it difficult to read
the patch.

Can you resend this patch - and your other one - in a way that it's
properly generated, perhaps as attachment?

Thanks,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SUSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20040604/a967e874/attachment.sig>