[PATCH] more x86-64 corrections

[Andreas Jaeger]

"H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

> On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 09:45:58AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:08:38AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
>> > Feel free to submit a patch to do what you prefer as long as it doesn't
>> > break gcc for Intel EM64T.
>> 
>> Intel EM64T is unreleased hardware.  HJ, are you testing on AMD Opteron
>
> It is your lucky day. You can buy Intel EM64T now.
>
>> HW that has been released for over 1 1/2 years??  Keeping Binutils
>> working 100% properly on released Opteron should take priority.
>>  
>
> I have no ideas what you are talking about.

The question is whether your patches will work on both AMD64 and Intel
EM64T - or just on Intel EM64T.  What are the consequences of your
patches for the existing AMD64 CPUs?

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SUSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20040725/9987855f/attachment.sig>