[Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 cgd@broadcom.com wrote:

> At Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:22:29 +0000 (UTC), "Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
> > (this has led to an address shift enlarging the
> > patch significantly, unfortunately).
> 
> maybe add nops to pad, instead?

 Well, addresses have been shifted down, so you'd have to remove 
something.  I suppose the break tests could be moved to the end of file, 
but I fail to see an advantage.  Test cases that embed addresses in output 
patterns are doomed to suffer from such changes.

  Maciej