as.info built in the source directory?
Tue Jul 13 12:49:00 GMT 2004
> DJ Delorie <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>> IIRC GNU standards require the info files to be part of the source
>>> distribution, so we have to build them in srcdir. However, this
>>> does cause the usual read-only-srcdir problems. Normally, the info
>>> files in cvs should be sufficiently up-to-date such that rebuilding
>>> is not normally required.
> They don't need to be built into the srcdir in order for them to be
> included in the source distribution. The source tree and the
> distribution are distinct.
> The info files aren't in CVS at all. We rely on maintainers to have
> the tools. I have no problem with that, but they shouldn't go into
> the source tree.
>>> This has been discussed in other projects, with no really good
> Yes, it's all downhill from here :-)
GDB's release process involves a configure/make-info/make-clean in the
src directory. This results in the files being included in the distro.
BTW, pot files have a similar problem.
More information about the Binutils