Problems with using libtool dependencies in opcodes

Andreas Jaeger
Sun Jan 4 13:50:00 GMT 2004

Daniel Jacobowitz <> writes:

> [...]
>> What exactly from my message explaining the patch is not clear?
>> using functionality from and therefore we need
>> to add a DL_NEEDED reference in to give:
>> $ ldd /usr/lib/ 
>> => /usr/lib/ (0x4002c000)
>> => /lib/i686/ (0x400c8000)
>>         /lib/ => /lib/ (0x80000000)
> That's precisely the reason I'm prepared to ignore.  I wanted to make
> sure that it didn't also cause a runtime failure in the binutils for
> some reason.

I'm not aware of another runtime failure.

> I am forced to consider build regressions more important than easily
> avoidable or harmless runtime problems and no one has demonstrated a
> fix for the libtool problem this patch uncovered.

 Andreas Jaeger,,
  SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the Binutils mailing list