[skanduru@earth.siliconrock.com: VMA different from LMA]

[Ian Lance Taylor]

Srinivasa Kanduru <skanduru@linux.sadhanapath.com> writes:

> I assume the address specified in Memory block is LMA and the
> location counter address would be the VMA. Is that correct ?

No, it is not correct.

You can use a MEMORY block to set the LMA if you use AT>, not >.  Read
the documentation I referred you to already:

    http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/docs-2.12/ld.info/Output-Section-LMA.html#Output%20Section%20LMA

Ian