include/ merge

Alan Modra amodra@bigpond.net.au
Tue Aug 17 22:25:00 GMT 2004


On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:20:43AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > The ChangeLog had a whole lot of old entries in it, brought in with a
> > gcc merge.  The older stuff is now in ChangeLog-9103.  I've fixed it,
> > and hopefully the next merge won't reintroduce all the old entries
> > again..
> 
> Of course it will if you "fix" it THAT way.  The merge is done by a
> program, so blindly discarding a lot of entries in only one repository
> is going to confuse it (it's already complaining to me that a merge is
> needed, but it can't figure out what the patch is).
> 
> Please revert this and let's fix it the right way.

Huh?  What's wrong with a ChangeLog split?  I reckon the file had grown
large enough to justify a split.  Apart from joining the two pieces
again, what other "right way" do you have in mind?

I'm quite willing to stitch the ChangeLog together again if that's what
you want..

>  If a gcc merge
> brought in bogus entries, let's revert that delta and add in the right
> one.  I'm willing to fix my mistakes but you have to give me a chance
> to.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre



More information about the Binutils mailing list