[PATCH] Fix objdump -d on ppc64 without dot syms (take 2)
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Tue Aug 17 05:40:00 GMT 2004
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:27:10PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> I suppose I could do something in the linker for old ABI objects that
> have a mismatch between code entry and function descriptor symbols..
This also fixes a segfault when using the srec linker.
bfd/
* elf64-ppc.c (add_symbol_adjust): Correct mismatched function
symbol visibility.
(ppc64_elf_check_directives): Check that we have the right hash
table before proceeding.
ld/testsuite/
* ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp: Cope with ppc64 dot symbols.
Index: bfd/elf64-ppc.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf64-ppc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.160
diff -u -p -r1.160 elf64-ppc.c
--- bfd/elf64-ppc.c 17 Aug 2004 01:25:21 -0000 1.160
+++ bfd/elf64-ppc.c 17 Aug 2004 05:10:55 -0000
@@ -3569,7 +3569,10 @@ ppc64_elf_archive_symbol_lookup (bfd *ab
new ABI object defines "bar". Well, at least, undefined dot symbols
are made weak. This stops later archive searches from including an
object if we already have a function descriptor definition. It also
- prevents the linker complaining about undefined symbols. */
+ prevents the linker complaining about undefined symbols.
+ We also check and correct mismatched symbol visibility here. The
+ most restrictive visibility of the function descriptor and the
+ function entry symbol is used. */
static bfd_boolean
add_symbol_adjust (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h, void *inf)
@@ -3585,8 +3588,7 @@ add_symbol_adjust (struct elf_link_hash_
if (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_warning)
h = (struct elf_link_hash_entry *) h->root.u.i.link;
- if (h->root.type != bfd_link_hash_undefined
- || h->root.root.string[0] != '.')
+ if (h->root.root.string[0] != '.')
return TRUE;
info = inf;
@@ -3595,9 +3597,19 @@ add_symbol_adjust (struct elf_link_hash_
fdh = get_fdh (eh, htab);
if (fdh != NULL)
{
- eh->elf.root.type = bfd_link_hash_undefweak;
- eh->was_undefined = 1;
- htab->twiddled_syms = 1;
+ unsigned entry_vis = ELF_ST_VISIBILITY (eh->elf.other) - 1;
+ unsigned descr_vis = ELF_ST_VISIBILITY (fdh->elf.other) - 1;
+ if (entry_vis < descr_vis)
+ fdh->elf.other += entry_vis - descr_vis;
+ else if (entry_vis > descr_vis)
+ eh->elf.other += descr_vis - entry_vis;
+
+ if (eh->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefined)
+ {
+ eh->elf.root.type = bfd_link_hash_undefweak;
+ eh->was_undefined = 1;
+ htab->twiddled_syms = 1;
+ }
}
return TRUE;
@@ -3608,8 +3620,14 @@ ppc64_elf_check_directives (bfd *abfd AT
struct bfd_link_info *info)
{
struct ppc_link_hash_table *htab;
+ extern const bfd_target bfd_elf64_powerpc_vec;
+ extern const bfd_target bfd_elf64_powerpcle_vec;
htab = ppc_hash_table (info);
+ if (htab->elf.root.creator != &bfd_elf64_powerpc_vec
+ && htab->elf.root.creator != &bfd_elf64_powerpcle_vec)
+ return TRUE;
+
elf_link_hash_traverse (&htab->elf, add_symbol_adjust, info);
/* We need to fix the undefs list for any syms we have twiddled to
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -p -r1.25 elfvsb.exp
--- ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp 11 May 2004 17:08:37 -0000 1.25
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp 17 Aug 2004 05:10:55 -0000
@@ -117,11 +117,11 @@ proc visibility_test { visibility progna
}
if {![ld_simple_link $CC $tmpdir/$progname.so "$shared $shldflags $tmpdir/$sh1 $tmpdir/$sh2"]} {
if { [ string match $visibility "hidden_undef" ]
- && [regexp ".*/sh1.c.*: undefined reference to \`visibility\'" $link_output]
+ && [regexp ".*/sh1.c.*: undefined reference to \`\.?visibility\'" $link_output]
&& [regexp ".*/sh1.c.*: undefined reference to \`visibility_var\'" $link_output] } {
pass "$testname"
} else { if { [ string match $visibility "protected_undef" ]
- && [regexp ".*/sh1.c.*: undefined reference to \`visibility\'" $link_output]
+ && [regexp ".*/sh1.c.*: undefined reference to \`\.?visibility\'" $link_output]
&& [regexp ".*/sh1.c.*: undefined reference to \`visibility_var\'" $link_output] } {
pass "$testname"
} else {
@@ -140,13 +140,13 @@ proc visibility_test { visibility progna
}
if ![ld_simple_link $CC $tmpdir/$progname "-Wl,-rpath,$rpath $tmpdir/$main $tmpdir/$progname.so"] {
if { [ string match $visibility "hidden" ]
- && [regexp ".*/main.c.*: undefined reference to \`visibility\'" $link_output]
+ && [regexp ".*/main.c.*: undefined reference to \`\.?visibility\'" $link_output]
&& [regexp ".*/main.c.*: undefined reference to \`visibility_var\'" $link_output] } {
pass "$testname"
} else { if { [ string match $visibility "hidden_undef_def" ]
- && [regexp ".*/main.c.*: undefined reference to \`visibility\'" $link_output]
+ && [regexp ".*/main.c.*: undefined reference to \`\.?visibility\'" $link_output]
&& [regexp ".*/main.c.*: undefined reference to \`visibility_def\'" $link_output]
- && [regexp ".*/main.c.*: undefined reference to \`visibility_func\'" $link_output]
+ && [regexp ".*/main.c.*: undefined reference to \`\.?visibility_func\'" $link_output]
&& [regexp ".*/main.c.*: undefined reference to \`visibility_var\'" $link_output] } {
pass "$testname"
} else {
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
More information about the Binutils
mailing list