2.15 branch merge
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Sat Apr 10 03:51:00 GMT 2004
On Apr 9, 2004, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure it affects non-FDPIC as well; I hope not, since the
> non-fDPIC emulation sets the page size to 0x1000, but I'll have to
> check.
Checked. It *does* change the alignment of PT_LOAD segments to 0x4000
even for binaries linked with -melf32frv :-(
I suppose I could create a new bfd arch used for object files that
have the EF_FRV_FDPIC bit set, but this would suck in terms of
duplication of code :-( Any better ideas? Is increasing the loadable
segment alignment a big deal?
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
More information about the Binutils
mailing list