2.15 branch merge

Alexandre Oliva aoliva@redhat.com
Sat Apr 10 03:51:00 GMT 2004


On Apr  9, 2004, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure it affects non-FDPIC as well; I hope not, since the
> non-fDPIC emulation sets the page size to 0x1000, but I'll have to
> check.

Checked.  It *does* change the alignment of PT_LOAD segments to 0x4000
even for binaries linked with -melf32frv :-(

I suppose I could create a new bfd arch used for object files that
have the EF_FRV_FDPIC bit set, but this would suck in terms of
duplication of code :-(  Any better ideas?  Is increasing the loadable
segment alignment a big deal?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}



More information about the Binutils mailing list