Why bfd_section_<op> (BFD, sec, ...?)

Andrew Cagney ac131313@redhat.com
Sat Oct 11 14:05:00 GMT 2003

Previous message (by thread): exception in static binary bug solved in upstream binutils!
Next message (by thread): Why bfd_section_<op> (*BFD*, sec, ...?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

Why do the section operators take a BFD when the SEC already has a BFD 
back-pointer?  Vis: bfd_get_section_name et.al.

Andrew

Previous message (by thread): exception in static binary bug solved in upstream binutils!
Next message (by thread): Why bfd_section_<op> (*BFD*, sec, ...?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Binutils mailing list