fix --check-sections consistency error

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Oct  9, 2003, Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:48:06PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Oct  9, 2003, Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>> 
>> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:17:09PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> >> * ldlang.c (lang_size_sections_1): Use IGNORE_SECTION to tell
>> >> whether to skip test for no memory region.
>> 
>> > Um, this changes more than just checking of zero sized sections.  You
>> > now ignore sections with just one of SEC_ALLOC or SEC_LOAD set.
>> 
>> Hmm...  Are you sure?

> Yep.

Doh!  Yes, indeed.  So much for my (in)abilities to simplify boolean
expressions :-)

Now...  Don't we want to make this change, to remain consistent with
IGNORE_SECTIONS elsewhere?  Or do we want to be stricter here?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer