bug-binutils@gnu.org

[Hans-Peter Nilsson]

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 04:14:41PM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> >On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Nick Clifton wrote:
> >> > My cvs build from a few days ago has bug-binutils@gnu.org listed as
> >> > the bug reporting address.  If bug-binutils@gnu.org is no longer the
> >> > working contact address listed for the tools, could a change to the
> >> > replacement address be made?
> >>
> >> This is a delicate issue, because the FSF insists that the
> >> bug-binutils address be the official bug reporting address.
> >
> >IIRC bug-binutils just forwards to bug-gnu-utils, one way or
> >another.  Perhaps it is simple to make it forward to

By "it" (forward) I mean forwarding bug-binutils, not
bug-gnu-utils.

Does that change your comments?  If not, read on.

> >binutils@sources.redhat.com?  Or to binutils@sourceware.org if
> >the vendor name is an issue?
>
> I don't see how that would be extremely useful since replies would end
> up here and not in bug-gnu-utils.

(Why should bug-binutils answers better go to bug-gnu-utils
rather than here?)

>  Also, the non-binutils email wouldn't
> really be appropriate here.

(I was referring to bug-binutils, so I think there'd only be
binutils-email. ;-)

brgds, H-P