[patch] MIPS/Linux: Let one select the default ABI for 64-bit

Nicholas Wourms nwourms@myrealbox.com
Wed May 21 21:32:00 GMT 2003


Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>  Well, admittedly, "mips64" as an alias for n32 is a wacked-out name for
> me.  I would assume <CPU>64 means full support for a <CPU> in it's 64-bit
> mode.  The (n)64 ABI fullfills it, but the n32 one doesn't as it's support
> for 64 bits is partial from the binutils' POV and minimal from the gcc's
> one.  Of course the participants of this mailing list, including you and
> me, fully understand these subtleties, but I wouldn't be so sure about
> everybody else, including many people at the <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
> list, let alone others.

On that note, it sure would be nice if people would document in either 
the mips-linux FAQ or the respective project FAQs what ./configure flags 
and triplets(or quintuplets) produce what with respect to the modern & 
cvs versions of binutils, gcc, & glibc.  Maybe documenting the 
discussion about which abi is best for what would be a nice addition. 
Because, frankly, I wouldn't blame anyone for being confused, especially 
considering the configuration inconsistencies across the full toolchain 
and notable lack of documentation describing what they do.

Just my opinion...

Cheers,
Nicholas



More information about the Binutils mailing list