[PATCH] config.bfd: Adding tic4x-*-rtems

[Ralf Corsepius]

Am Fre, 2003-06-20 um 10.33 schrieb Nick Clifton:
> Hi Ralf,
> 
> > I would like to propose tic4x-*-rtems to be added to config.bfd (2.14 +
> > mainline, cf. patch against 2.14-branch below)
> 
> 
> > 2003-06-20  Ralf Corsepius  <corsepiu@faw.uni-ulm.de>
> >
> > 	* config.bfd: Add tic4x-*-rtems*.
> 
> Approved and applied.  (Although I just added the new entry on the
> same line as the current (ti)c4x-coff entry.  I saw no particular
> reason to split it up over multiple lines.
;)

> One question though:
> 
> > +  c4x-*-*coff* | \
> > +  tic4x-*-*coff* | tic4x-*-rtems*)
> 
> Shouldn't there also be support for a "c4x-*-rtems*" target ?

IMHO, there should not be any c4x-* target (I.e. IMHO, references to
c4x-* should be removed from binutils, because the c4x-*-target is dead
for binutils and gcc and has been replaced by tic4x-*.)

Therefore, instead, binutils should better complain and abort if being
configured for c4x-*.


Ralf