New port m32r-linux

[Hans-Peter Nilsson]

> Kazuhiro Inaoka writes:
>  > Would you tell me the process of porting new targets if there are any
>  > policies?

No policies except talking to the vendor. :-)

>  > Do we need to keep the compatiblity of m32r-linux relocations with m32r-elf?

Don't change the meaning of the relocations.  Arrange to add new
ones instead.  (A good tome to work out the unclear details
about R_M32R_26_PCREL, methinks.  See the comment at the entry
in m32r_elf_howto_table.

On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Doug Evans wrote:

> Having m32r-elf.o be incompatible with m32r-linux.o would be a
> mistake.  Don't go there.  They must be compatible.

Why so?  I'm coping fine with CRIS.  As Nick pointed out, some
detail must be worked out to make them non-linkable of course.
Or maybe you just refer to the reloc semantics; I agree then.

brgds, H-P