Unreviewed patches

[H. J. Lu]

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:58:05PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 12:40:40PM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-05/msg00741.html
> 
> Since I think I suggested PT_GNU_STACK in the first place,
> I'm a bit biased, but I like this solution.  It's the least
> amount of work for the kernel in execing a new application
> short of having a dedicated ET_FLAGS bit (which we don't).
> 
> The patch is ok.
> 

I like the proposal. But I don't like the implementation.
I'd like to see a generic note section for properties of
a relocatable file. I will make a detailed suggestion
tomorrow.


H.J.