[RFC] unify dynamic_symbol_p implementations

[Hans-Peter Nilsson]

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:28:15AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 10:52:42PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > > Looks reasonable to me, except these hunks.
> > Um, those hunks are exactly the unification of the
> > STV_PROTECTED handling vs function descriptors.
> You changed
 [seemingly obvious functional change for ia64]
> For those symbols on which the new elfNN_ia64_dynamic_symbol_p returns
> the same as the old one, the code logic is reversed. Is that
> intentional?

Hey, if it had been wrong, it surely would have been caught in
some ia64 ld test-case! 8-)

brgds, H-P