[RFA] Top-level configure.in needs AC_PREREQ
Wed Jan 8 18:05:00 GMT 2003
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I think the minimal autoconf version needed for the new autoconfiscated
> configure.in is 2.13, correct? If so, I think an AC_PREREQ is called
> for, if for no other reason than to be consistent with gcc, gdb,
> binutils. winsup, etc.
> RCS file: /cvs/uberbaum/configure.in,v
Yes, please. All configure.in's should have AC_PREREQ. It
makes life much easier when you compile gcc and friends
under both cygwin and debian, as we do.
Linux User #78045
More information about the Binutils