MIPS patch to avoid lazy binding in la macros

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 09:02:01PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> > If you do this, you introduce another required version binding between
> > GCC and binutils to create a working MIPS toolchain;
> 
> I don't think it's a hard requirement.  If you don't patch gcc,
> the worst that's going to happen is that functions in new DSOs
> won't be lazily bound.  OK, that might be quite bad in some
> cases, but...

I might be misinterpreting what you said.  I got the impression that
your changes affected tests of undefined weak symbols equal to zero -
was I wrong?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer