[ob] Regenerate src/configure with 000227
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@redhat.com
Tue Feb 18 21:16:00 GMT 2003
>> Just FYI, I've committed the attached as `obvious'. It regenerates
>> src/configure using (hopefully) the correct autoconf. Without this the
>> build barfs with the weird syntax error:
>
>
> I would argue against any autoconf *snapshot* being the "right" one.
> Aren't we supposed to be using the official fsf release of 2.13? Your
> change added the sitefile code, which wasn't there before, so it's not
> just a bugfix - it's a feature change as well.
To expand on DanielJ's comment. When fixing a GDB / BINUTILS autoconf
botch, the final patch _always_ results in the addition of the sitefile
stuff. To me, having that in the diff _is_ normal.
> Plus, you need to test this "obvious" change in the gcc tree and apply
> it there also - the trees are out of sync now, but they should be in
> sync.
Should it instead be re-generated with pure 2.13? Better first question
though is what did GeoffK use? (I'm guessing that it was Geoff's regen
that broke it).
Andrew
More information about the Binutils
mailing list