MIPS empic failures?
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Fri Feb 14 03:28:00 GMT 2003
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 03:51:14PM -0800, Eric Christopher wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 15:45, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:
> > i just noticed the following failures for mips-elf:
> >
> > FAIL: MIPS empic
> > FAIL: MIPS empic2
> > FAIL: MIPS empic3 (global, negative)
> > FAIL: MIPS empic3 (global, positive)
> >
> > anybody know when they cropped up?
>
> *blink* no. I'll take a look.
'Twas this
2003-02-13 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
* write.c (TC_FORCE_RELOCATION_SUB_SAME): Revert last change.
* config/tc-s390.h (TC_FORCE_RELOCATION_SUB_SAME): Define.
The question is whether mips really needs a special
TC_FORCE_RELOCATION_SUB_SAME, or whether the testcase just needs
adjusting for fewer relocs. I think the latter is correct, but I'm
no MIPS expert.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
More information about the Binutils
mailing list