MIPS empic failures?

Alan Modra amodra@bigpond.net.au
Fri Feb 14 03:28:00 GMT 2003


On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 03:51:14PM -0800, Eric Christopher wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 15:45, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:
> > i just noticed the following failures for mips-elf:
> > 
> > FAIL: MIPS empic
> > FAIL: MIPS empic2
> > FAIL: MIPS empic3 (global, negative)
> > FAIL: MIPS empic3 (global, positive)
> > 
> > anybody know when they cropped up?
> 
> *blink* no. I'll take a look.

'Twas this

2003-02-13  Alan Modra  <amodra@bigpond.net.au>

	* write.c (TC_FORCE_RELOCATION_SUB_SAME): Revert last change.
	* config/tc-s390.h (TC_FORCE_RELOCATION_SUB_SAME): Define.

The question is whether mips really needs a special
TC_FORCE_RELOCATION_SUB_SAME, or whether the testcase just needs
adjusting for fewer relocs.  I think the latter is correct, but I'm
no MIPS expert.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre



More information about the Binutils mailing list