objdump, 64-bit objects and Solaris kernel modules
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@mvista.com
Mon Feb 10 20:32:00 GMT 2003
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 12:26:38PM -0800, Steve Madsen wrote:
> Gabriel Marin wrote:
> >The problem is not limited at 64-bit binaries. I had this problem with
> >32-bit binaries.
>
> I applied your patch to the latest from CVS this morning and it does not
> fix the problem for me on 64-bit binaries.
>
> It appears that my version of Forte is using different names for the
> STABS debugging sections than expected by
> _bfd_stab_section_find_nearest_line. That functions looks for .stab and
> .stabstr, and if not found, assumes that the object contains no
> debugging info and exits.
>
> Forte generates the following STABS sections in my object:
>
> 6 .stab.index 00000114 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000025b0 2**2
> CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
> 7 .stab.indexstr 00000320 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000026c4 2**0
> CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
> 8 .stab.excl 0000765c 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000029e4 2**2
> CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
> 9 .stab.exclstr 0001bfa1 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000a040 2**0
> CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
Unfortunately, this is a form of stabs that neither GDB nor Binutils
supports.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
More information about the Binutils
mailing list