[BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)

[H. J. Lu]

On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 07:39:58AM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Carlo,
> 
> >> > info as possible ?  It seems that including this information is what
> >> > it causing the problem, and ideally what we ought to be doing is
> >> > discarding .gnu.linkonce sections containing debug info, rather than
> >> > retaining them.
> >> 
> >> I'd be happy when the info is disregarded.  Much better than
> >> assigning it the address of another function.
> >> 
> >> Is it possible to do this instead, before 2.14 is released
> >> at large?
> >
> > What is the status of this Problem Report?
> 
> Sorry - it has been sidelined whilst I try to get through all of the
> work that boss has assigned to me.  I think that the last thing that
> happened was that HJ said that there was a better way to fix the
> problem, but I am not sure if he implemented it.
> 

That is the bug we have to live with until SHT_GROUP is used by gcc.
BTW, I am still waiting for a simple testcase to show the problem
with gdb.


H.J.