ld's --enable-new-dtags shortcomings
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Sat Dec 6 05:31:00 GMT 2003
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 03:39:35PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:00:47AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > As an additional note - the DT_HIOS definition seems to be wrong: gABI
> > specifies 0x6FFFF000, glibc also uses this value, but binutils says
> > 0x6FFF0000.
>
> Having looked at the history of the changes, I think this is just
> a simple typo in the binutils files. Fixing.
From Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
* common.h (DT_HIOS): Correct value.
Index: include/elf/common.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/include/elf/common.h,v
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -p -r1.60 common.h
--- include/elf/common.h 13 Jun 2003 13:07:51 -0000 1.60
+++ include/elf/common.h 6 Dec 2003 05:12:37 -0000
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@
values outside of the new range (see below). */
#define OLD_DT_LOOS 0x60000000
#define DT_LOOS 0x6000000d
-#define DT_HIOS 0x6fff0000
+#define DT_HIOS 0x6ffff000
#define OLD_DT_HIOS 0x6fffffff
#define DT_LOPROC 0x70000000
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
More information about the Binutils
mailing list