PATCH: Add LIBPATH_SUFFIX for ${tool_lib}.

[Alan Modra]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 05:20:02PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:37:02AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:52:42PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > We didn't add LIBPATH_SUFFIX for ${tool_lib}. As the result, we got
> > > 
> > > SEARCH_DIR("/export/tools/ppc64-linux/lib");
> > > 
> > > This patch changed it to
> > > 
> > > SEARCH_DIR("/export/tools/ppc64-linux/lib64"); SEARCH_DIR("/export/tools/ppc64-linux/lib");
> > 
> > I think this would be wrong.  By adding a /lib64 version of
> > ${tooldir}/lib you seem to be inferring that ${tooldir}/lib is now for
> > 32 bit libraries.
> 
> Isn't that true? When you configure binutils with
> 
> ..../configure --target=ppc64-linux --prefix=/export/tools
> 
> where are 32 bit libraries? where are 64bit libraries?

In /export/tools/lib, /export/tools/lib64 and so on.  ie. in the normal
system lib dirs.

I'm very nervous about changing the meaning of ${tooldir}/lib without
some serious thought as to the consequences.  Also, to achieve anything,
you'll need to change a whole lot of other tools, eg. gcc, that know
that $prefix/$target/* contain headers and libs for $target.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre