PATCH: Fix ldxmov relaxation
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Fri Apr 18 15:40:00 GMT 2003
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 08:14:57AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 05:09:21AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 10:02:41PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > BTW, there may be a small ldxmov/ltoff22x ld bug. Shouldn't we relax
> > > ldxmov/ltoff22x after we finish all brl relaxation?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > I have a patch for that.
> >
> > Eh? I don't think the current relax_section interface
> > supports this. It's not a small problem.
> >
>
> Here is my patch.
Do you need a generic flag for this?
Ie. can't just elfNN_ia64_relax_section, if it a) has seen any ldxmov
relocs b) would otherwise return FALSE set an IA-64 internal section
flag and return TRUE?
Jakub
More information about the Binutils
mailing list