PATCH: Fix ldxmov relaxation

Jakub Jelinek jakub@redhat.com
Fri Apr 18 15:40:00 GMT 2003


On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 08:14:57AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 05:09:21AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 10:02:41PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > BTW, there may be a small ldxmov/ltoff22x ld bug. Shouldn't we relax
> > > ldxmov/ltoff22x after we finish all brl relaxation?
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > > I have a patch for that.
> > 
> > Eh?  I don't think the current relax_section interface
> > supports this.  It's not a small problem.
> > 
> 
> Here is my patch.

Do you need a generic flag for this?
Ie. can't just elfNN_ia64_relax_section, if it a) has seen any ldxmov
relocs b) would otherwise return FALSE set an IA-64 internal section
flag and return TRUE?

	Jakub



More information about the Binutils mailing list