Improvements and fixes for mips n32/n64 relocations

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Apr 11, 2003, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Apr 10, 2003, Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Yes with the change I noticed offline and the one that I missed that cgd
>> spotted and the changes you noticed :)

> Here's one more problem introduced along with my patch.  I'm going
> ahead and checking it in, since you approved it in private.

Of course, the two other occurrences of the same test had to be
adjusted as well, which unfortunately was only noticeable at run-time.
While at that, I thought I'd avoid keeping three separate copies of
the same test all over, and unified them into a single location.
Since Eric had agreed with the patch in principle, I'm going ahead and
checking this in.  Please let me know if you'd like any tweaks or
further changes to it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mips-got-fix-more.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1802 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20030412/258c1f66/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer