ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS problems on ppc

[Alan Modra]

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 09:45:24AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> Also, I'd like to hear from Geoff as to why we
> have both SYMBOL_REFERENCES_LOCAL and SYMBOL_CALLS_LOCAL, introduced
> by http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2000-10/msg00184.html.  They
> differ in that SYMBOL_REFERENCES_LOCAL doesn't consider STV_PROTECTED
> syms as local, which seems a bit strange to me.

Oh, nevermind.  I'm a dunce.  Funny how seeing a testcase fail,
glibc's elf/vismain.c in this case, makes things obvious.  :)

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre