new port for Xtensa processors (bfd files)

[Bob Wilson]

On Wednesday 02 April 2003 09:33 am, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Making the changes in consultation with Tensilica is not really an
> option, since that would imply some kind of ownership by Tensilica.
> But making the changes in consultation with the maintainer for the
> Xtensa port is certainly reasonable, and if that maintainer just
> happens to work for Tensilica....

OK.  Whatever :-)

(I don't see how consulting with a 3rd party in the interest of compatibilty 
implies ownership by that party, but you can't really consult with an 
abstract entity like a corporation anyway....)


> On a different note - there is a problem with the linker tests you
> contributed.  They are being run for non-Xtensa ports.  eg from a
> recent run of the x86 linux native:

Fixed as follows:

2003-04-02  Bob Wilson  <bob.wilson@acm.org>

        * ld-xtensa/coalesce.exp: Skip if target is not xtensa-*-*.
        * ld-xtensa/lcall.exp: Likewise.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ld-tests.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20030402/89d4c090/attachment.bin>