top level: make more dependencies explicit
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@redhat.com
Sun Sep 29 12:25:00 GMT 2002
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 01:09:22PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Nathanael,
>>
>> FYI, I'm about to revert this change:
>>
>> 2002-09-25 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
>>
>> * Makefile.tpl: Make subsituted variables more autoconfy.
>> * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
>> * configure: Make seds more autoconfy.
>>
>> It breaks both the GDB and BINUITLS snapshot processes. Details to
>> follow, however, suggest a short pause.
>
> Uh... yuck.
>
> Are there some details on the GDB and BINUTILS snapshot processes so that
> I can fix *them*? This change is going to happen eventually, even if
> it's reverted for now; the Makefile changes will be necessary for
> autoonfiscation.
>
> Wait, let me look at Makefile.in...
>
> Ewwwww. The taz rules use Makefile.in *as a Makefile*.
> That's the root of the problem, isn't it? Incidentally, that's
> disgusting. :-)
Well I think ``SHELL = @config_shell@'' is ugly :-) Why can't the
configury code edit ``s/^SHELL =.*/SHELL = $.../''.
The mechanism is very old (it pre-dates me as GDB release engineer).
Changing it is going to involve updates to many things - snapshot
scripts, release process doco, .... so won't happen overnight.
Andrew
More information about the Binutils
mailing list