Get rid of underscore.c

[Paul Koning]

>>>>> "Nick" == Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> writes:

 Nick> Hi Guys, : Andrew Cagney wrote: : : How about GCC bundle in a
 Nick> program called g++filt while binutils : bundle c++filt.

 Nick> I like this idea.  We keep the demangling code in one place -
 Nick> libiberty - where it can be accessed by all the tools that want
 Nick> to use it (g++, gdb, binutils, libstdc++), and each tool can
 Nick> decide how it wants to interface to this code.  G++ would have
 Nick> its g++filt program, binutils would have c++filt, libstdc++
 Nick> would do whatever it does with it and so on.

 Nick> The only problem I see with this solution is user confusion.
 Nick> If they install both gcc and binutils they will end up with two
 Nick> demangler programs in their bin.  Which one do they use ?
 Nick> Provided that they both produce the same results it will not
 Nick> matter which one they choose, but if the results differ things
 Nick> could get really confusing.

User confusion, indeed.  

I think this would be a truly evil "solution".  As a gcc/binutils user
I would conclude that some bizarre political problem has caused an
obviously broken approach to be picked, rather than one of several
sensible right answers.

	 paul