MIPS gas is broken now.

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Thiemo Seufer wrote:

> I don't believe 32 bit only code handling actually needs 64 bit wide
> values. Things like signedness errors may lead to wrong code with 32
> bit BFD, but these are IMHO bugs which should be fixed.

 Well, a 32-bit only configuration should actually be less error-prone to
signedness issues as an unsigned 32-bit int is expressed at the machine
level the same way as a signed 32-bit int is, which is not the case for a
64-bit configuration.  Anyway a 32-bit target doesn't normally need 64-bit
processing, so if there is a problem with a 32-bit only configuration for
MIPS, it'd better be tracked down and fixed, indeed. 

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +