MIPS is broken

[H. J. Lu]

On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > 
> > It may be a false alarm. I couldn't reproduce it. I might have mixed
> > gcc 3.2 and gcc 2.96 while building glibc 2.3.
> 
> I've also seen this unreproducibly, using GCC 3.2 and binutils 2.12.1
> on MIPS - but there may have been a GCC-2.95.3-compiled object in the
> tree.  It'd be interesting to find a reproducible test case, but I
> haven't succeeded.

Same here. I will keep an eye on it.


H.J.