bfd.h installation location

Alexandre Oliva aoliva@redhat.com
Sat May 11 01:04:00 GMT 2002


On May 11, 2002, Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> wrote:

> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:15:38PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> Today I noticed that bfd.h gets installed under $prefix/include instead

> I question whether we should be installing any of these files by
> default.

My thought exactly.

However, even if we don't install them by default, an explicitly
requested install should still install them in an appropriate place.

> Which projects using libbfd don't provide their own copy of bfd?

None I'm aware of.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer



More information about the Binutils mailing list