i386-pc-nto-qnx patch
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Fri May 10 06:31:00 GMT 2002
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 11:20:05AM -0400, Graeme Peterson wrote:
> I've seen a lot of talk about merging patches, and was wondering
> if anyone has had time to look at the i386-pc-nto-qnx patch I
> submitted.
I've looked at it a couple of times, thought "why is he doing that?"
and put it aside until I could analyse your code a little deeper.
So, why is IS_CONTAINED_BY_FILEPOS necessary? Just because
_bfd_elf_make_section_from_shdr isn't setting up lma correctly for
you? Seems to me the right solution is some tweakery to
_bfd_elf_make_section_from_shdr. You'll probably want this anyway
as other parts of bfd look at the section lma.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
More information about the Binutils
mailing list