merge to branch

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 11:21:42PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:10:57PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > I've been merging a few of my recent patches to the branch, and
> 
> Some more:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-04/msg00164.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-04/msg00165.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-04/msg00166.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-04/msg00167.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-04/msg00168.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-04/msg00169.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-04/msg00170.html
> 
> Other things that IMHO should go on the branch, but I'm probably
> not the best judge of that. :)
> 
> o  toplevel dir, config/, etc/ changes

No.  Not necessary, not beneficial.

> o  binutils/rc*,res*,wind* fixes and related testsuite updates

I see these went in.  Great!

> o  bfd/*coff* fixes
> o  gas/config/tc-d10v.c fixes
> o  gas/config/tc-tic54x.c fixes
> o  pdp11, z8k fixes
> o  testsuite updates.
> o  rs6000 xcoff? - not sure whether this work is bugfix or new feature.
> o  mips???

I don't consider any of this critical, and I haven't seen complaints
to speak of.  If anyone wants any of these on the branch, speak very
quickly.

Otherwise, I'm going to spin a prerelease soon - probably Friday
evening.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer