[RFA] Clean up intl/ in distclean
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@mvista.com
Fri Mar 8 11:33:00 GMT 2002
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:29:37PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:59:00AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >>intl/ leaves behind stamp-h, config.cache, and config.status after a 'make
> >>distclean'; this patch removes them. OK to commit this, and get them out
> >>of
> >>binutils release tarballs - or do patches to intl/ go somewhere else
> >>first? The MAINTAINERS entry is not exactly clear.
> >
> >I'll pursue where this patch should go, but for now I'm committing it
> >on the release branch. I have some precedent; I see that it was in a
> >not-so-recent GDB release branch.
>
> Er, which GDB release (knowing my luck 5.0 :-)? If it didn't go into
> the trunk it shouldn't have gone into the branch. I'd call it a screwup
> rather than a precedent :-)
Looks like 4.18 and 5.0 both:
revision 1.1.1.1.4.1
date: 2000/04/19 06:05:09; author: cagney; state: Exp; lines: +3 -2
distclean: Remove generated files config.status, config.h and stamp-h.
gdb_5_0-2000-05-19-release: 1.1.1.1.4.1
gdb_4_18_2-2000-05-18-release: 1.1.1.1.4.1
gdb_4_95_1-2000-05-11-snapshot: 1.1.1.1.4.1
gdb_4_95_0-2000-04-27-snapshot: 1.1.1.1.4.1
> >I'm also putting it on the GDB 5.2 branch, at Andrew's request, since
> >the request arrived while I was typing this :) Andrew, I won't close
> >the PR till we figure out how this goes on the trunk.
>
> I was thinking once it is resolved for the trunk :-)
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
More information about the Binutils
mailing list