copy_private_bfd_data in bfd/elf.c question

Alan Modra amodra@bigpond.net.au
Sat Jun 22 04:56:00 GMT 2002


On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 06:28:10PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com> writes:
> 
> |> > How about posting before/after output of readelf -S -l, so we can
> |> > have a clue as to what is going on.

Note to Steve: -l not -I !  I was curious as to whether the segment
map changed.  If it didn't then no matter.

> |>   [ 4] .hash             HASH            04000620 000620 0000a4 00   A  0   0  8
[snip]
> |>   [ 4] .hash             HASH            04000620 00061c 0000a4 04   A  2   0  8
> 
> This seems to be the culprit.

sizeof_hash_entry == 4, so why does this matter?

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre



More information about the Binutils mailing list