copy_private_bfd_data in bfd/elf.c question
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Sat Jun 22 04:56:00 GMT 2002
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 06:28:10PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com> writes:
>
> |> > How about posting before/after output of readelf -S -l, so we can
> |> > have a clue as to what is going on.
Note to Steve: -l not -I ! I was curious as to whether the segment
map changed. If it didn't then no matter.
> |> [ 4] .hash HASH 04000620 000620 0000a4 00 A 0 0 8
[snip]
> |> [ 4] .hash HASH 04000620 00061c 0000a4 04 A 2 0 8
>
> This seems to be the culprit.
sizeof_hash_entry == 4, so why does this matter?
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
More information about the Binutils
mailing list