Group identifier of a comdat group
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Tue Jun 4 18:09:00 GMT 2002
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 05:43:17PM -0700, Jessica Han wrote:
> That's what I figured out too. I checked on IA64 Linux and IA64 HPUX, the
> name field of that particular symbol is always 0, thus the result name
> string is always "". I verified it with debugging objcopy, group_signture
> always return "". Any ideas?
Sounds like a problem in the object file itself. Do the group section
header sh_link and sh_info fields make sense, ie. point into the
symbol table? If they do point at a symbol, then it's a matter of
debugging gas to figure out why the sym is bad.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
More information about the Binutils
mailing list