[patch] MIPS64: A 32-bit address range fix

[Eric Christopher]

On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 16:06, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On 8 Jul 2002, Eric Christopher wrote:
> 
> > That'll work. not quite what I meant though. I meant did you run make
> > check-gcc etc?
> 
>  No.  Should I?  Especially with gcc ~2.95.4 I'm using?  The code
> generated now is definitely broken for the case I described. 
> 

Probably, as long as there aren't any regressions in the gcc that you
are using that'll be fine for me. I agree that it is broken, and a
binutils testcase would be nice, but a sanity check with gcc is always
appreciated as well.

Thanks.

-eric

-- 
I will not carve gods