[PATCH] Further unification of ARM messages.

[Richard Earnshaw]

> After rechecking coff-arm.c and elf32-arm.h, I discovered yet more places
> where messages could be unified. Here's the patch to accomplish that. It
> also corrects punctuation and removes the gettext calls for APCS-26
> and APCS-32 in elf32_arm_print_private_bfd_data as these should not be
> translated.

> +		(_("ERROR: %s compiled for APCS-%d, whereas %s is compiled for APCS-%d"),

Need to use verbs consistently: "%s compiled" vs "%s is compiled" (use the 
latter).

> +		msg = _("ERROR: %s compiled as position independent code, whereas target %s is absolute position");

Likewise

> +		msg = _("ERROR: %s compiled as absolute position code, whereas target %s is position independent");

Likewise


> +ERROR: %s compiled for EABI version %d, whereas %s is compiled for version %d"),

Likewise

> +ERROR: %s compiled for APCS-%d, whereas target %s uses APCS-%d"),
>  			      bfd_archive_filename (ibfd),
>  			      in_flags & EF_ARM_APCS_26 ? 26 : 32,
>  			      bfd_get_filename (obfd),

Likewise

> -Warning: %s supports interworking, whereas %s does not"),
> +Warning: %s supports interworking, whereas %s does not."),

I believe the coding convention is no period at the end of a message.

> -Warning: %s does not support interworking, whereas %s does"),
> +Warning: %s does not support interworking, whereas %s does."),

And again

R.