Possibly unnecessary differences in messages

[Richard Earnshaw]

> * Richard Earnshaw (rearnsha@arm.com) [20020129 19:35]:
> 
> > > so, the messages should be identical, and the only question would be which
> > > of the two should be used.
> > 
> > Yes.
> 
> Damn, I should have been more precise ;-) Which wording should I use?
> 'because the non-interworking code in %s has been copied into it' or
> 'because non-interworking code in %s has been linked with it' ?
> 
> To me at least the second looks like the better choice.

Agreed.

R.