PATCH: More stdbool tweaking

[Ian Lance Taylor]

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:

> In any case, your patch would not finesse the problem.  False is
> defined to 'false', an enum value, in <stdbool.h>.  While the value
> false evalutates to 0, that would not fix the problem, since it is not
> the same.

In gcc 2.95.3, you're right.  Blast.  The situation is indeed
impossible.  There is no possible approach which will not break the
gdb build.

I definitely agree that bfd.h should not include stdbool.h, and you
should check in that change now to avoid the current broken snapshots.

Ian