[patch] binutils current: libiberty/configure and --with-build-subdir

[H . J . Lu]

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 10:27:56AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:29:42AM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > 
> > These changes seem wrong to me.  The point of them is to avoid trying
> > to auto-detect certain things because we're building a target library,
> > but for the build libiberty we are guaranteed to have a working
> > toolchain and we can safely autodetect everything.
> > 
> 
> How about this patch? We just need to get the right "libiberty_topdir".
> We don't need to guess the build machine name since it is passed to
> libiberty. The only thing missing is the toplevel "config" directory
> which may be needed by libiberty. I have a kludge for that also.
> 

libiberty only needs the toplevel "config" directory for shared library.
But I don't think we should do it for the build library since it is
only used during build and is not the part of the final binaries.


H.J.