[RFA] bfd vs stdbool.h

[Jimi X]

re: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-01/msg00669.html

On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:23:44AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I described this problem a week or two ago and finally got around to fixing
> it.  Is this patch OK?
> > Only compile-tested on i386-linux.  Previously broken because my
> /usr/include/curses.h includes <stdbool.h> too.

> Committed, thanks Alan.  Let's see if anyone suffers.

I suffer, libncurses5-devel-5.2 defines bool as an int and does not
include stdbool.h until patch 20011201 which is only 2 months old.

-JX